Kathy Pearson
Ashgate
Hardback
264
1999
Conflicting Loyalties in Early Medieval Bavaria examines the successes and failures of the Agilolfingi dukes and their Carolingian royal successors as they attempted to establish effective territoriality within early-medieval Bavaria. The dukes and kings relied heavily on two major strategies: the use of the Church as an extension of the ruler?s authority over both territory and its inhabitants and the creation of proto-vassalic and vassalic ties with members of the landowning class. Pursuit of these strategies forced the Bavarian rulers to deal with the ambivalence of their clerical and secular ?lites whose patterns of loyalty were shaped by a variety of familial religious or territorial concerns of their own not always compatible with the ruler?s interests. This book explores these various conflicting loyalties and demonstrates that although Bavaria did evolve into a distinct territorial principality the ambitions and loyalties of the landowning ?lites could never be fully subordinated to royal authority.
Ashgate
Hardback
264
1999
Conflicting Loyalties in Early Medieval Bavaria examines the successes and failures of the Agilolfingi dukes and their Carolingian royal successors as they attempted to establish effective territoriality within early-medieval Bavaria. The dukes and kings relied heavily on two major strategies: the use of the Church as an extension of the ruler?s authority over both territory and its inhabitants and the creation of proto-vassalic and vassalic ties with members of the landowning class. Pursuit of these strategies forced the Bavarian rulers to deal with the ambivalence of their clerical and secular ?lites whose patterns of loyalty were shaped by a variety of familial religious or territorial concerns of their own not always compatible with the ruler?s interests. This book explores these various conflicting loyalties and demonstrates that although Bavaria did evolve into a distinct territorial principality the ambitions and loyalties of the landowning ?lites could never be fully subordinated to royal authority.